In this piece, I found myself re-reading the beginning
because it does not flow with the rest of the essay. Stevenson is giving this anecdotal
piece to use the metaphor of Lantern-Bearers, who are the ones that hold the truths in
all of life. I did not find this the method of writing effective because the
first part has all of description and storytelling that the reader only becomes engaged at the end, when he is explaining the significance of lanterns and how the
bearers only know the truth. I also thought the rest of the piece was somewhat
choppy and confusing. Stevenson describes different trades and how they seem to
harbor different characteristics or traits, such as the Dancer, he explains as “…must
have the love of power and disdain of using it, noble character in itself…” To
me, this seems unfair because he is grouping a trade into a general consensus
where everyone that is a “Dancer” will think or act this way. He then goes on
to talk about how certain writers are basically predictable when they express romance
or love. The confusing part about this essay is when he criticizes Whitman for
being a realist and describing the dullness of a man. My problem with this
essay is the feeling that Stevenson is reading too far into any particular
subject matter. He thinks that because Whitman is describing the dullness of
man that he does not see the beauty in life or the miracles that can happen. This
essay is also contradicting: “…dark as his pathway seems to be the observer…”
Right there he is saying that we judge each other, but we don’t actually
know what is going on behind the thousands of layers built up, when he seems to be criticizing
other writers on only their content. Lastly, he ends his piece by condemning melodramas
as “without some brightness of poetry and luster of existence, falls into the
inconceivable and ranks with fairy tales.” This seems overly judged and untrue. Melodramas have their way of letting people escape from reality, so it begs the
question of whether or not this is so bad? I also think he is wrong about fairy
tales. The original Brothers Grimm fairy tales were children stories to
instill values and to learn the ways of the world, which contradicts his
theory of Lantern-Bearers.
I hope our discussion in class clarified some of this for you. Stevenson isn't criticizing Whitman. He writes, "Whitman knew very well, and showed very nobly. . ." (219).
ReplyDeleteResponse seems like a first draft. I invite you to give it another run-through if you want.
DW